Skip to content
Phoenix Encyclopaedia™
Skip entry navigation
PhoenixContinuum

Phoenix EncyclopaediaOpen Beta

E031

E031 · Sensory experience, body & daily living

Motor coordination and movement difficulties

Open BetaSource notes and limitations are included below.
Key question

What might be happening when everyday movement, coordination or learning a physical skill requires much more effort, time or conscious planning than the situation allows?

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

Overview

Movement supports participation throughout the day: sitting, walking, dressing, using tools, eating, playing, writing, navigating space and joining practical learning. These tasks draw on balance, posture, timing, coordination, strength, vision, sensation, motor planning and repeated opportunity.

A young person may understand exactly what to do but find it difficult to organise or carry out the movement. A skill that becomes automatic for peers may remain slow and consciously controlled. Performance can vary with fatigue, novelty, time pressure, environment and the number of actions combined.

Motor coordination and movement difficulties are a presentation rather than a diagnosis. Developmental coordination disorder (DCD), often called dyspraxia, may be one explanatory lens, but movement differences can also arise from sensory, visual, neurological, musculoskeletal or health needs. E026 is the direct route when written production is the central concern; E019 when sensory seeking is central; this page concerns movement and functional participation.

The useful question is not:

“Why are they so clumsy?”

but:

“Which movement demand is difficult, what makes it harder, and how can the activity become safe, achievable and worth joining?”

An oar rests in its rowlock with its blade just above the water.
Fig 1. What looks like one movement may ask for many things to come together.

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

What this might look like

A young person might:

  • take longer to learn running, jumping, catching, cycling or swimming;
  • bump into objects or misjudge distance and force;
  • find balance, stairs or uneven ground difficult;
  • avoid playground games or physical education;
  • struggle with scissors, cutlery, fastenings or practical equipment;
  • use excessive force or a very light grip;
  • find handwriting effortful, slow or painful;
  • need to watch their hands closely during a task;
  • complete each movement separately rather than as a smooth sequence;
  • find new environments or unfamiliar equipment especially demanding;
  • tire from maintaining posture or coordinating movement;
  • spill, drop, knock over or break items despite care;
  • appear disorganised when the real bottleneck is managing objects and movement;
  • be reluctant to change clothes, eat publicly or join practical lessons;
  • show stronger verbal or conceptual skill than physical output suggests;
  • develop effective personal methods that look different from the expected technique.

The functional impact matters more than whether movement looks typical. A young person may complete a task but at a cost that limits everything that follows.

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

How this may change through development

At this stage

Early childhood

Movement milestones and play skills develop at different rates. Concern may arise when coordination substantially limits exploration, feeding, dressing or play, or when progress is accompanied by pain, asymmetry, loss of skill or other developmental concerns.

Early childhood

Movement milestones and play skills develop at different rates. Concern may arise when coordination substantially limits exploration, feeding, dressing or play, or when progress is accompanied by pain, asymmetry, loss of skill or other developmental concerns.

Middle childhood

School assumes increasing speed and independence in handwriting, changing, using equipment and playground games. Repeated failure may lead to avoidance or the label “careless”. Direct teaching and task adaptation can protect participation.

Early adolescence

Growth, changing bodies, multiple classrooms and public comparison can increase demand. Practical subjects, crowded corridors and team sports may become prominent barriers. The young person's preferences should guide activity and privacy planning.

Later adolescence

Travel, self-care, work tasks, driving, cooking and independent organisation create new functional goals. Support should prioritise meaningful competence, equipment and safe strategies rather than normalising appearance.

Choose each stage to see how the presentation and surrounding expectations may change over time.

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

Strengths and differences

A young person with movement difficulties may also show:

  • strong reasoning and problem solving;
  • determination and careful preparation;
  • inventive ways to complete practical tasks;
  • verbal, creative, technological or strategic strengths;
  • detailed awareness of equipment and environment;
  • empathy for the effort hidden inside everyday activities;
  • success in physical activities chosen for fit rather than convention.

Difficulty in team games is not lack of interest in movement. Enjoyable activity may be found through swimming, walking, dance, martial arts, climbing, adapted sport or other individually meaningful routes.

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

Top tips for support

Start with the activity that matters

Define a functional goal with the young person: fastening clothing, carrying lunch, joining a game or using equipment. Avoid decontextualised exercise as the only plan.

Analyse the task and environment

Notice posture, balance, sequence, timing, visual guidance, sensory demands, equipment, space and fatigue. Change the task as well as teaching the skill.

Teach explicitly and practise meaningfully

Break the activity into manageable parts, model, practise little and often, give focused feedback and vary the context once success is developing.

Allow more time without public exposure

Plan changing, transitions and practical setup so extra time does not mean missing learning, breaks or friendships.

Adapt tools and output

Consider stable seating, alternative grips, lighter or larger equipment, accessible fastenings, digital recording and reduced copying. Seek professional advice for individual equipment.

Offer genuine participation choices

Modify rules, roles, distance, team size or equipment. Do not make observation from the side the only alternative to standard performance.

Protect confidence and safety

Address teasing, avoid public comparison and recognise fatigue. Build success without removing age-respectful challenge.

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

Barriers at school

Common barriers include:

  • describing accidents as carelessness;
  • repeated public demonstrations of a difficult skill;
  • choosing teams in ways that expose difference;
  • using loss of break or physical activity as a consequence;
  • one-size-fits-all handwriting or fine-motor programmes;
  • expecting extra practice after the young person is fatigued;
  • inaccessible furniture, tools, clothing or storage;
  • rushed changing and crowded transitions;
  • removing practical participation rather than adapting it;
  • assuming weakness, coordination and motor planning are interchangeable;
  • focusing on neatness rather than comfort and function;
  • overlooking vision, pain or neurological signs;
  • lowering cognitive demand because physical output is slower;
  • expecting a teaching assistant to complete rather than enable the task.

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

Things needing careful planning

Map fine motor, gross motor, balance, posture, bilateral coordination, visual-motor integration, sequencing, fatigue and participation across real activities. Compare familiar and new tasks, quiet and busy spaces, demonstration and verbal instruction, and performance early and late in the day.

Ask about pain, falls, joint instability, headaches, vision, hearing, feeding, continence, sleep and emotional impact. Consider whether the task has been taught and practised in an accessible way.

New weakness, loss of previously acquired movement, persistent pain, marked asymmetry, seizures, severe headache or movement change after injury requires prompt medical assessment. A DCD label should not be used to explain away new or progressive signs.

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

Practical support principles

A useful movement plan has five parts:

1. Goal — choose a meaningful activity with the young person. 2. Analyse — identify task, body and environmental demands. 3. Adapt — change equipment, space, time or method to enable participation. 4. Teach — practise the specific skill in manageable, varied steps. 5. Review — measure safety, effort, confidence and real-world use.

Progress may mean using a different method safely, joining for longer, needing less conscious effort or choosing an enjoyable form of movement. It is not limited to looking coordinated to an observer.

A board rests on a non-slip pad against a low bench stop, supported without being held.
Fig 2. An adjustment can reduce the effort needed to organise movement.

From understanding to support

Relevant Phoenix Atlas approaches

ApproachFitWhy
A005 Environmental adaptationAtlas record availableOften usefulChanges tools, furniture, space, timing, route and task format so movement does not become an avoidable access barrier.
A020 Explicit instruction and modellingAtlas record availableDevelopment prioritySupports clear demonstration, manageable steps, guided practice and focused feedback for functional skills.
A016 Executive-function scaffoldingAtlas record availableOften usefulExternalises sequences, equipment and routines when motor planning and organisation interact.
A006 Visual and anticipatory supportsAtlas record availableWorth consideringCan show steps, layout and preparation, provided visual information itself is accessible.
A003 Co-regulationAtlas record availableContext dependentHelps preserve safety and persistence when repeated motor difficulty has created fear or frustration.

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

Evidence and cautions

NHS guidance describes DCD as a condition affecting physical coordination and everyday activities, with wide variation across children. Support is tailored and may include breaking difficult activities into parts, practising them and adapting tools or tasks.

The Department for Education's sensory and physical evidence review supports needs-led environmental and task adaptations alongside specialist input where required. It also distinguishes motor and sensory-impairment needs from sensory-processing descriptions.

Evidence for DCD intervention generally favours task-oriented, participation-focused approaches over assuming that isolated underlying exercises will automatically transfer to everyday function. Diagnosis requires more than appearing clumsy and includes significant functional impact and exclusion of other explanations.

Source notes

Phoenix Encyclopaedia

Explanatory lenses

Motor coordination and movement difficulties may occur alongside DCD, cerebral palsy, muscular or joint conditions, visual impairment, developmental language disorder, ADHD, autism, intellectual disability, acquired brain injury and other neurological or health presentations.

They may also reflect limited opportunity, unsuitable equipment, a task not yet taught, acute injury or fatigue. Functional observation across settings is essential.

Diagnosis can guide specialist advice and self-understanding when criteria are met. Ordinary adaptation, inclusive physical activity and respect for different methods should begin from need.

The continuing Phoenix question is:

“Which movement demand is limiting participation, and what combination of adaptation, teaching and specialist advice makes the activity possible?”

About this entry’s source

Open Beta · read the evidence notes and limitations

Source status describes the underlying material. The current site edition is Open Beta; the evidence notes and limitations remain part of the entry.